[webbeans-dev] which would be easier to implement?

Mark Struberg struberg at yahoo.de
Tue Aug 25 03:36:40 EDT 2009


What happens if you have a @SessionScoped bean in an EAR lib which is @Specializes in 2 different WebApps within this EAR but not in a 3rd one?

Might get tricky if we drop the original bean, isn't?

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 8/24/09, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
> Subject: [webbeans-dev] which would be easier to implement?
> To: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>, "WebBeans" <webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 8:45 PM
> Should we say that any bean that is
> specialized by an enabled bean is
> disabled - i.e. no Bean object exists? Or should we leave
> it like it
> is now?
> 
> -- 
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
> 


      



More information about the weld-dev mailing list