[webbeans-dev] Re: XML configuration format

[Jim Knutson]

Given the fact that changing syntax requires work, but doesn't let you do
anything different than the old syntax, it doesn't add much additional
value.  What value it would bring is aesthetic for the most part.

Thanks,
Jim Knutson
WebSphere J2EE Architect


                                                                           
             Scott Ferguson                                                
             <ferg at caucho.com>                                             
                                                                        To 
             01/07/2009 05:41          Jim Knutson/Austin/IBM at IBMUS        
             PM                                                         cc 
                                       Michael Keith                       
                                       <MICHAEL.KEITH at oracle.com>, Gavin   
                                       King <gavin.king at gmail.com>, Java   
                                       Community Process JSR #299 Expert   
                                       List <JSR-299-EG at jcp.org>, Matt     
                                       Drees <matt.drees at gmail.com>,       
                                       WebBeans                            
                                       <webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org>      
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: XML configuration format        
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           





On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Jim Knutson wrote:



      given that a new schema syntax doesn't really add much additional
      value


Please give evidence for this assertion.

-- Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090107/b594c378/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090107/b594c378/attachment.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic11006.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1255 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090107/b594c378/attachment-0001.gif 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090107/b594c378/attachment-0002.gif