[webbeans-dev] Re: Rough draft proposal for resource injection

[Gurkan Erdogdu]

Hi;

As far as I know, with the *JMS exception*,  Java EE container injects the artifacts : Java EE Resources, Persistent Context, Persistent Unit, EJB and WebService when developer use the applicable annotations that are defined in its respective specifications.

I think that addition of the extra layer may not be necessary for these type of resources.

Thanks;

/Gurkan




________________________________
From: Gavin King <gavin at hibernate.org>
To: Java Community Process JSR #299 Expert List <JSR-299-EG at jcp.org>; Matt Drees <matt.drees at gmail.com>; Scott Ferguson <ferg at caucho.com>; WebBeans <webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:04:32 AM
Subject: [webbeans-dev] Re: Rough draft proposal for resource injection

I have still received very little feedback on this proposal...

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Gavin King <gavin at hibernate.org> wrote:
> Now here's a much more complete proposal that also makes the JMS
> resource stuff follow the new approach.
>
> Look at the following sections:
>
> 3.6
> 3.7.2
> 6.8
> 10.3
>
> Seems to be working out very nicely. I really hope you guys like it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Gavin King <gavin at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> Here's a second draft (still rough) that incorporates persistence
>> contexts and units into the same approach.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Gavin King <gavin at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> Everyone, please take a look at section 3.6 of this spec draft, which
>>> defines a proposal for EE resource injection.
>>>
>>> Basically, what I've proposed is that web beans would let you rewrite
>>> the following:
>>>
>>>   @Resource(mappedName="customerDatabase") Datasource ds;
>>>
>>> as:
>>>
>>>   @CustomerDatabase Datasource ds;
>>>
>>>   <javaxsql:Datasource>
>>>      <Resource>
>>>         <mappedName>customerDatabase</mappedName>
>>>      </Resource>
>>>      <myapp:CustomerDatabase/>
>>>   </javaxsql:Datasource>
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>>   @EJB(ejbLink="somejar#Foo") Foo foo;
>>>
>>> as:
>>>
>>>   @Current Foo foo;
>>>
>>>   <myapp:Foo>
>>>      <EJB>
>>>         <ejbLink>somejar#Foo</ejbLink>
>>>      </EJB>
>>>   </myapp:Foo>
>>>
>>> and:
>>>
>>>   @WebServiceRef(name="barbar", wsdlLocation="barbarbar") Bar bar;
>>>
>>> as:
>>>
>>>   @Current Bar bar;
>>>
>>>   <myapp:Bar>
>>>      <WebServiceRef>
>>>         <name>barbar</name>
>>>         <wsdlLocation>barbarbar</wsdLocation>
>>>      </WebServiceRef>
>>>   </myapp:Bar>
>>>
>>> So this proposal is just basically an indirection around the
>>> pre-existing semantics of Java EE injection, that gives you all the
>>> nice Web Beans typesafety.
>>>
>>> This seems a really nice, easy way to define this stuff, and I love
>>> how the XML looks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gavin King
>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>> http://hibernate.org
>>> http://seamframework.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>



-- 
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090113/3b109d6b/attachment.html