[webbeans-dev] Re: Packages proposal

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Mon Jan 26 10:08:07 EST 2009


Done, the @Model stereotype is still defined in the PRD2 spec (2.7.5)  
but it's location is not defined in appendix 3.

On 23 Jan 2009, at 14:03, Pete Muir wrote:

> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBRI-117
>
> we'll do this for alpha1.
>
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 00:59, Gavin King wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's also what I concluded.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Scott Ferguson <ferg at caucho.com>  
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Gavin King wrote:
>>>
>>>> How would the "import list" be specified?
>>>
>>> I'd assume a text file in the classpath like javax/javaee/ 
>>> urn.java.imports
>>> or META-INF, if that's more appropriate.  It's just a list of  
>>> packages, so
>>> the file is trivial.
>>>
>>> I believe JAXB has a similar kind of file called jaxb.index, but I  
>>> can't
>>> remember where it lives or exactly what it contains.
>>>
>>> As long as an IDE or WebBeans implementation can grab and parse  
>>> the file
>>> using ClassLoader.getResource, it doesn't really matter.
>>>
>>> -- Scott
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Scott Ferguson <ferg at caucho.com>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Gavin King wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In conjunction with this proposal, I would like to propose that  
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> have a "special" XML namespace, which instead of mapping to a  
>>>>>> single
>>>>>> package, maps to several packages. This is an ease of use  
>>>>>> feature for
>>>>>> commonly used types.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the idea, but I'd want a consistent mechanism as an  
>>>>> extension of
>>>>> normal WebBeans urn:java handling:
>>>>>
>>>>> For example,
>>>>>
>>>>> Given xmlns:foo="urn:java:com.foo"
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. <foo:MyBar> - WebBeans looks for com.foo.MyBar for a class or
>>>>> annotation
>>>>> (same as current rule).
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. if com.foo has an "import list" of packages, then WebBeans  
>>>>> also looks
>>>>> in
>>>>> those packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> As long as the spec defines "urn:java:javax.javaee" along that  
>>>>> kind of
>>>>> rule,
>>>>> the "package import" doesn't need to be an explicit part of the  
>>>>> current
>>>>> spec.  Just as long as it could be generalized for a future spec.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The namespace "urn:java:javax" is a shortcut that may be used  
>>>>>> to refer
>>>>>> to types in any of the following packages (as long as there is no
>>>>>> ambiguity):
>>>>>
>>>>> It would need to be "urn:java:javax.javaee" because the JavaEE  
>>>>> specs
>>>>> don't
>>>>> have ownership over all of "urn:java:javax".
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Potentially even:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> javax.jms
>>>>>> javax.sql
>>>>>> javax.annotation.security
>>>>>> JAX-RS
>>>>>
>>>>> Eventually, javax.servlet.http.annotation.WebServlet :)
>>>>>
>>>>> <qa:MyServlet>
>>>>> <javaee:WebServlet value="/foo"/>
>>>>> </qa:MyServlet>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Scott
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Gavin King  
>>>>>> <gavin at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a proposal for API repackaging:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.annotation: (existing package)
>>>>>>> @NonBinding
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.interceptor: (existing package)
>>>>>>> @Interceptor
>>>>>>> @InterceptorBindingType
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.decorator: (decorators)
>>>>>>> @Decorator
>>>>>>> @Decorates
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.stereotype: (stereotypes)
>>>>>>> @Stereotype
>>>>>>> @Model
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.context: (scopes and contexts)
>>>>>>> @ScopeType
>>>>>>> @ApplicationScoped
>>>>>>> @RequestScoped
>>>>>>> @SessionScoped
>>>>>>> @ConversationScoped
>>>>>>> Context
>>>>>>> Contextual
>>>>>>> ContextNotActiveException
>>>>>>> Conversation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.inject: (injection, binding types, deployment types)
>>>>>>> @BindingType
>>>>>>> @DeploymentType
>>>>>>> @Named
>>>>>>> @Initializer
>>>>>>> @New
>>>>>>> @Specializes
>>>>>>> @Realizes
>>>>>>> @Current
>>>>>>> @Production
>>>>>>> @Standard
>>>>>>> @Produces
>>>>>>> @Disposes
>>>>>>> @Obtains
>>>>>>> Instance
>>>>>>> DefinitionException
>>>>>>> DeploymentException
>>>>>>> ExecutionException
>>>>>>> IllegalProductException
>>>>>>> CreationException
>>>>>>> AmbiguousDependencyException
>>>>>>> DuplicateBindingTypeException
>>>>>>> InconsistentSpecializationException
>>>>>>> NullableDependencyException
>>>>>>> UnproxyableDependencyException
>>>>>>> UnsatisfiedDependencyException
>>>>>>> UnserializableDependencyException
>>>>>>> TypeLiteral
>>>>>>> AnnotationLiteral
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.inject.manager: (framework integration SPI)
>>>>>>> @Initialized
>>>>>>> @Deployed
>>>>>>> Bean
>>>>>>> InjectionPoint
>>>>>>> Decorator
>>>>>>> Interceptor
>>>>>>> InterceptionType
>>>>>>> Manager
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> javax.event: (events)
>>>>>>> @Observes
>>>>>>> @Asynchronously
>>>>>>> @IfExists
>>>>>>> @AfterTransactionCompletion
>>>>>>> @AfterTransactionFailure
>>>>>>> @AfterTransactionSuccess
>>>>>>> @BeforeTransactionCompletion
>>>>>>> @Fires
>>>>>>> Event
>>>>>>> Observer
>>>>>>> ObserverException
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The types I'm most uncomfortable with are TypeLiteral and
>>>>>>> AnnotationLiteral, which aren't really specific to injection.  
>>>>>>> I wonder
>>>>>>> if there's some other place they could go....?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arguably @Named belongs somewhere else....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And there's a piece of me which wants to put @Realizes and
>>>>>>> @Specializes in javax.stereotype, for some reason which I  
>>>>>>> can't quite
>>>>>>> put my finger on....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Gavin King
>>>>>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>>>>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>>>>> http://hibernate.org
>>>>>>> http://seamframework.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Gavin King
>>>>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>>>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>>>> http://hibernate.org
>>>>>> http://seamframework.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>>>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gavin King
>>>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>>>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>> http://hibernate.org
>>>> http://seamframework.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev




More information about the weld-dev mailing list