[webbeans-dev] Granularity of assertions in TCK
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Thu Jul 23 16:25:01 EDT 2009
Here is another guideline - use the <note> field in the audit - for
example if you mark an assertion implicit or untestable, it's always
worth adding a note. For example in the case of
- <assertion id="a2">
+ <assertion id="a2" testable="false">
<text>If the application invokes a contextual instance after it
has been destroyed, the behavior is undefined.</text>
I would add a note like
<note>A statement about container specific behavior which is not spec
defined</note>
the other common one is the spec making a note about how another spec
behaves, for example
<assertion id="a" testable="false">
<text>As defined by the EJB specification, all stateful session
beans are passivation capable. Stateless and singleton session beans
are not passivation capable.</text>
</assertion>
there should be a note like
<note>Defined by EJB spec</note>
On 23 Jul 2009, at 03:57, Dan Allen wrote:
> Thanks for these guidelines Pete.
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list