[webbeans-dev] standard name for conversation

[Pete Muir]

This is the case today (the spec requires this name, the TCK enforces  
it).

On 9 May 2009, at 00:28, Dan Allen wrote:

> It would seem very useful if certain components had standard names.  
> For instance, it is quite common to consult the conversation object  
> in JSF via the EL. I would hate for different implementations to use  
> different names making the reference to the conversation non- 
> portable. Would it be reasonable to make javax.context.conversation  
> the standard name?
>
> e.g. #{javax.context.conversation.longRunning}
>
> -Dan
>
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than  
> a week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a  
> message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete