[webbeans-dev] Towards CR1

[Clint Popetz]

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
> > short question:
> >
> >> * removing interceptor language from spec
> >
> > Hmm without interceptors, how should we handle @Transactional and stuff?
> Having interceptors in the standard is pretty convenient.
>
> This got moved to the managed bean specification which 299 depends on.
>

What exactly is the "Managed Beans specification?"  It's referenced in two
places in the spec.  Is it another JSR?  Where do we get a copy? The only
specified "Managed Bean" I know of is in JSF...I presume that's not what's
referenced here.

-Clint


> >
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > --- Pete Muir <pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk> schrieb am Do, 21.5.2009:
> >
> >> Von: Pete Muir <pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk>
> >> Betreff: [webbeans-dev] Towards CR1
> >> An: webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> CC: ee6jboss at sun.com, roger.kitain at sun.com
> >> Datum: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009, 19:36
> >> All,
> >>
> >> As you've seen, Gavin is approaching publishing the PFD of
> >> 299; before the final draft can be submitted, we need to
> >> complete both the RI and TCK. We're under quite a tight
> >> schedule - we have around 6 weeks.
> >>
> >> 1) Shane will update the TCK audit (which maps the spec to
> >> the tests) to the current draft. Hopefully we will start to
> >> see this coming through early next week. Once this is done,
> >> we'll have a better idea of how much work there is to do.
> >>
> >> 2) David will take the lead on updating tests to the new
> >> TCK, with Shane working to help him. The order in which the
> >> tests are done should be same as for the RI
> >>
> >> 3) We'll do the major work on the RI in this priority
> >> order:
> >>    - New SPI
> >>    - New bootstrap
> >>    - decorators
> >>    - New resource handling stuff
> >>    - minor fixes and changes as a result of
> >> the new spec language
> >>
> >> If you want to take on any of the above, please shout now!
> >>
> >> We still need clarification from Gavin/EG on:
> >>
> >> * removing interceptor language from spec
> >> * exactly how this inter-relates with the managed bean
> >> spec
> >> * exactly how we proceed when the RI supports a particular
> >> function which requires container integration, and no one
> >> container supports all integration points.
> >>
> >> I don't plan any interim releases between now and CR1, as
> >> releases take time, and we are under a tight schedule. These
> >> changes don't generally impact the core functionality
> >> (except around bootstrap), so I am confident that we don't
> >> need another beta.
> >>
> >> I do plan a reasonably long series of CRs to ensure that
> >> the codebase is stable, I don't have a firm date for the
> >> release yet. Once we enter the CR series, the 299 API and
> >> the Web Beans API/SPI cannot change.
> >>
> >> Thanks for all your hard work so far - getting to CR1 is a
> >> major milestone!
> >>
> >> Pete
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> webbeans-dev mailing list
> >> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
> http://www.seamframework.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>



-- 
Clint Popetz
http://42lines.net
Scalable Web Application Development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20090526/1cbf5868/attachment.html