[weld-dev] ref guide (re)draft ready

[Peter Royle]

> > - Java SE sections need review for accuracy, relevance

Could only manage a quick look over the weekend and 

- the general SE section is accurate but could use some padding,
particularly the introductory paragraphs
- the numberguess Swing example uses out-of-date annotations and
requires updating.

I'll try to do both of these by Thursday, that OK?

Pete.



> > - Extending CDI (extend.xml) is extremely thin, to the point of being
> > marginally useful compared to the spec
> > - Weld extensions (extensions.xml) is underwhelming; do we have more to say
> > than just about logging?
> > - The chapter on producer fields (producerfields.xml) is missing, though
> > producer fields are explained in intro.xml
> > - The Weld SPI needs to be reviewed for accuracy, relevance (ri-spi.xml);
> > this was a *long* chapter and I just don't know the Weld SPI yet
> >
> > I did add a lot of content while revising, but the ref guide can always be
> > improved.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > --
> > Dan Allen
> > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> > Registered Linux User #231597
> >
> > http://mojavelinux.com
> > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> 
> 
>