[weld-dev] GIT
Pete Muir
pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk
Sat Nov 21 10:50:15 EST 2009
On 21 Nov 2009, at 14:15, Steven Boscarine wrote:
> Works for me, personally.
>
> As an outsider, it's obviously more friendly for non-JBoss employees
> like me to contribute. I am still waiting on someone to tag those Weld
> Maven archetypes I submitted so I can commit to trunk for review without
> worrying about breaking anything. With git, that wouldn't be an issue.
You are welcome to tag whenever you want :-)
But I agree, GIT supports distributed development much better.
>
> I have only used it for personal projects, though. I don't know if
> it'll make life easier or harder for whoever has to manage these releases.
>
>
>
>
>
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was whether to switch to
>> GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN.
>>
>> This would give us a IMO a system well suited to our distribued dev
>> model, it would also make it much easier for others to sandbox PEs and
>> then contribute them back to us.
>>
>> The proposal is to use Github to host.
>>
>> The team members at devoxx were in favour, but what do others think?
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> --
>> Pete Muir
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list