[weld-dev] GIT

Pete Muir pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk
Sat Nov 21 10:50:15 EST 2009


On 21 Nov 2009, at 14:15, Steven Boscarine wrote:

> Works for me, personally. 
> 
> As an outsider, it's obviously more friendly for non-JBoss employees 
> like me to contribute.  I am still waiting on someone to tag those Weld 
> Maven archetypes I submitted so I can commit to trunk for review without 
> worrying about breaking anything.  With git, that wouldn't be an issue. 

You are welcome to tag whenever you want :-)

But I agree, GIT supports distributed development much better.

> 
> I have only used it for personal projects, though.  I don't know if 
> it'll make life easier or harder for whoever has to manage these releases. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was whether to switch to
>> GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN.
>> 
>> This would give us a IMO a system well suited to our distribued dev
>> model, it would also make it much easier for others to sandbox PEs and
>> then contribute them back to us.
>> 
>> The proposal is to use Github to host.
>> 
>> The team members at devoxx were in favour, but what do others think?
>> 
>> Pete
>> 
>> --
>> Pete Muir
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev



More information about the weld-dev mailing list