[weld-dev] persistence and transactions outside Java EE
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 12:16:37 EST 2009
Ah. Standalone JCA is a problem. But do we really need JCA, or can we
just let Hibernate use one of the standalone connection pools that it
ships with?
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> I chatted to Jonathan about this, he tells me the binary for JBossTS JTA is under 1MB with no external dependencies other than the JTA API (but we would probably need standalone JCA too).
>
> On 18 Nov 2009, at 23:10, Gavin King wrote:
>
>> I think we should try and follow the Java EE models as closely as
>> possible for this stuff. We should simply try and make the Java EE
>> code work outside EE 6.
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> (1) use a resource declaration with @PersistenceContext(unitName=....)
>> to define a managed persistence context
>> (2) use JBoss Transactions to manage transactions in a servlet engine
>> - so instead of having a special tx manager for JDBC, it is just JTA
>>
>> Or is the 10meg download for JBoss Transactions just no good?
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king at gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
--
Gavin King
gavin.king at gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list