[weld-dev] FYI: Code from forum committed in seam-persistence and seam-transaction.

[Dan Allen]

Agreed. We should view transactions+persistence as an atomic concern.

-Dan

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> I think we can delete the transaction module, and just put all of this in
> persistence. I can't see why you would want one module and not the other....
>
> On 24 Nov 2009, at 04:08, Steven Boscarine wrote:
>
> > I committed the code from
> http://www.seamframework.org/Community/HowDoIGetAJPAEntityManagerReferenceInWeld#comment106502to
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/seam/modules/trunk/persistence
> > and https://svn.jboss.org/repos/seam/modules/trunk/transaction
> >
> > I imported persistence into a trivial web app and it appears to work.  I
> haven't had time to write any useful tests yet.
> >
> > The transaction project is not compiling.  Perhaps it's older code?  I
> commented out the dependencies that are not on the repo and changed
> jsr299-api to cdi-api.  It was originally failing to validate because it was
> missing ${webbeans.groupId}.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>



-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091124/03e8901a/attachment.html