[weld-dev] persistence and transactions outside Java EE

[Arbi Sookazian]

In most cases perhaps not.  But what about config required for JBoss and
XA/2PC datasources?  Isn't that config manually required in foo-xa-ds.xml as
well as configuring default tx isolation?

http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/ConfigDataSources

<transaction-isolation> - the default transaction isolation of the
connection (unspecified means use the default provided by the database):

   -

   TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED
   -

   TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
   -

   TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ
   -

   TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
   -

   TRANSACTION_NONE



On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Reza Rahman <reza_rahman at lycos.com> wrote:

> Steven,
>
> The difference is that in a Java EE centric environment, there is *no
> configuration needed period*, inside or outside the WAR to get
> transactional functionality.
>
> Cheers,
> Reza
>
>
> Boscarine, Steven wrote:
> > How is the UserTransaction you're mentioning different than the one
> Spring provides?
> http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html/ch10.html
> >
> > There's no configuration needed outside the war.
> > ________________________________
> > From: weld-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [weld-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org]
> On Behalf Of Dan Allen [dan.j.allen at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:22 PM
> > To: Gurkan Erdogdu
> > Cc: Weld-Dev
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] persistence and transactions outside Java EE
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu at yahoo.com
> <mailto:gurkanerdogdu at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>>> the main concern is that JTA transactions simply aren't available in a
> servlet environment (without extra configuration).
> >>>>
> > AFAIK, you can use UserTransaction object
> >
> > If I download Tomcat or Jetty right now (unless I didn't get the memo) I
> won't have a UserTransaction.
> >
> > Yes, if I spend half the day searching the web to find a tutorial that
> actually works, maybe I can "upgrade" these containers to support JTA, but
> that's a PITA.
> >
> > If you can tell me that placing a single JAR file in the container so
> that EJB lite works, then we have something.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> > --
> > Dan Allen
> > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> > Registered Linux User #231597
> >
> > http://mojavelinux.com
> > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091124/539de64a/attachment-0001.html