[weld-dev] SQL framework proof of concept

[Arbi Sookazian]

OH come on.  Can't you be more creative than that, it's the weekend after
all?  It's like being trapped in a jail cell, the JVM, and you'll never
break free until you break the rules somehow.  We need some kind of
advantage over the other groups: http://deoxy.org/hs_cehn.htm

what kind of an elevation is OOP or AOP really when you consider invisible
dimensions?  there's gotta be something else lurking invisibly somewhere...

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, great. I've just decided to break the rules and say that up is
> down. You should all be lying on the ceiling by now.
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > don't you hate the rules?  it was an interesting question... break the
> > rules.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Eh? By definition you can't do anything with the type system at
> *runtime*!
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Would it be doable to use e.g. Javassist to transform a class into one
> >> > of those static typesafe "entity classes" at runtime?
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian at gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Looks like there are two tables (users and permissions) but
> >> >> testQuery2() and
> >> >> testQuery3() both select only from one table - users.  So now we need
> a
> >> >> small db schema (i.e. data model).  The typical customers and orders
> >> >> would
> >> >> suffice to demo FK and potential outer joins.  How can I define
> >> >> customerId
> >> >> as a FK on orders table?  Ideally, it would be nice to be able to do
> >> >> all
> >> >> this via tooling (i.e. exec a wizard that would generate the code for
> >> >> us).
> >> >> But we need to be able to do all this via the API for now...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> New rev, with ability to pass SQL as strings.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king at gmail.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > Latest, with a new approach to specifying types.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Gavin King
> >> >>> gavin.king at gmail.com
> >> >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> >> >>> http://hibernate.org
> >> >>> http://seamframework.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> weld-dev mailing list
> >> >>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> weld-dev mailing list
> >> >> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > ---
> >> > Nik
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gavin King
> >> gavin.king at gmail.com
> >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> >> http://hibernate.org
> >> http://seamframework.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> weld-dev mailing list
> >> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20091128/5674aa9a/attachment.html