[weld-dev] Does the generated bean proxy use SLF4J?
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Thu Dec 30 05:15:20 EST 2010
No apologies needed, just wanting to make sure it got your attention in the Christmas period ;-)
On 30 Dec 2010, at 08:50, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> No, the proxies do not need slf4j. Sorry about the late response, I have been on holidays and have not had regular Internet access (and spent a long time sitting on the side of the road broken down on the way home).
>
> Stuart
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 29/12/2010, at 20:51, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Stuart?
>>
>> On 28 Dec 2010, at 10:48, Sivakumar Thyagarajan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> A clarification requested. Does the generated bean proxy ever use SLF4J?
>>>
>>> Earlier, I had added [1] the SLF4J api and implementation packages to
>>> the weld-integration-fragment bundle in GlassFish that exports all the
>>> packages that are needed for bean proxies, but I see that preventing an
>>> application component to use their own SLF4j api or impl binding [2].
>>> Removing the SLF4J packages doesn't cause any issues with my tests and I
>>> was wondering if SLF4J is used by the generated proxy class in any
>>> other scenarios.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> --Siva.
>>> [1]
>>> http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/GLASSFISH/search?author=sivakumart&filename=pom.xml#4296824472030
>>> [2] http://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-11683
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> weld-dev mailing list
>>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list