[weld-dev] [TCK] Bug in Passivation Capable Dependency Test

[Pete Muir]

Agreed, please file an issue.

On 24 Feb 2010, at 19:21, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

> Tests under  the following packages
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingBeanConstructor
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInitializerMethod
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInjectedField
> 
> packages tests decorators injection points to check they are passivation capable dependency or not. Even if they are not passivation capable dependency, it is ok becuase "UnderWaterCity"  class in all of the above tests has not passivated scope.
> 
> In other words, even if UnderWaterCity class implements SErializable, it does not define passivated scope therefore it is not necessary to check its interceotırs or decorators
> 
> Is this a bug?
> 
> Thanks;
> 
> --Gurkan
> 
> Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!
> Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! Türkiye'de!
> www.yahoo.com.tr_______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev