[weld-dev] [seam-dev] question about issue workflow

[Pete Muir]

Right, we discussed this a while back and it's working well.

On 19 Oct 2010, at 06:37, Stuart Douglas wrote:

> I have been marking it as resolved when I add the pull request URL,
> and Pete has been closing them after the changes have been merged.
> 
> This seems to work fairly well. I don't think we need to go 'Pull
> Request Available' -> 'Resolved' -> 'Closed', as you will generally
> want to close the issue after the code has been accepted into trunk.
> 
> Stuart
> 
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When a contributor has submitted a pull request as a candidate resolution to
>> an issue, what issue state should the issue be put into?
>> I'd like to suggest that we introduce a new state that indicates a pull
>> request is pending and a review and, if accepted, merge is necessary. This
>> state could be interpreted as a soft "Resolved".
>> -Dan
>> 
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>> 
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev