[weld-dev] ManagedBean and Weld integration

Emily Jiang emijiang6 at googlemail.com
Thu Jun 4 04:36:19 EDT 2015


Thank you Jozef! Glad to know that we eventually synced up. It will be
great if this bug is fixed soon.

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com> wrote:

>  Hi Emily,
>
> thanks for your patience :-) You are right that this is a bug in Weld. I
> filed https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1963 to track this issue.
>
> Jozef
>
>
> On 06/03/2015 03:41 PM, Emily Jiang wrote:
>
>   Hi Jozef,
>  The non-CDI interceptor was created by Weld when I called
> injectionTarget.produce() on a ManagedBean class. I have no control of it.
> Please see above for the stack. The stack shows the creation sequence
> (managed bean creation -> non-cdi interceptor creation). I used the
> following snippet to create injection Target for the ManagedBean.
>
>             Bean<T> bean = getBean(); // returns null for managed bean
> with dependent scope
>
>             AnnotatedType<T> annotatedType =
> beanManager.createAnnotatedType(clazz);
>             InjectionTargetFactory<T> itf=
> beanManager.getInjectionTargetFactory(annotatedType);
>             injectionTarget = itf.createInjectionTarget(bean);
>              injectionTarget.produce(context); //produce an instance with
> all non-cdi and cdi interceptors... but the non-cdi interceptors without
> any ee injection
>
>  Thanks
>  Emily
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Oops, sorry. Ignore my last e-mail. How do you obtain the
>> InjectionTarget for the non-CDI interceptor?
>>
>>
>> On 06/03/2015 12:52 PM, Emily Jiang wrote:
>>
>>  Jozef,
>>  The PlainInterceptorFactory is weld class. Here is the stack when we
>> created an instance for a managed bean class (@ManagedBean) by calling
>> injectionTarget.produce(); You are not asking me to override
>> PlainInterceptorFactory, right?
>>
>>
>>  Caused by: java.lang.Exception
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BasicInjectionTarget.createNonCdiInterceptor(BasicInjectionTarget.java:69)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.chooseInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:126)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:87)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:80)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInterceptorInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:75)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.interceptor.reader.PlainInterceptorFactory.of(PlainInterceptorFactory.java:41)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.interceptor.reader.InterceptorMetadataReader$1.load(InterceptorMetadataReader.java:44)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.interceptor.reader.InterceptorMetadataReader$1.load(InterceptorMetadataReader.java:39)
>> at
>> com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LoadingValueReference.loadFuture(LocalCache.java:3599)
>> at
>> com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.loadSync(LocalCache.java:2379)
>> at
>> com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.lockedGetOrLoad(LocalCache.java:2342)
>> at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.get(LocalCache.java:2257)
>> at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.get(LocalCache.java:4000)
>> at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.getOrLoad(LocalCache.java:4004)
>> at
>> com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LocalLoadingCache.get(LocalCache.java:4874)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.util.cache.LoadingCacheUtils.getCacheValue(LoadingCacheUtils.java:49)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.util.cache.LoadingCacheUtils.getCastCacheValue(LoadingCacheUtils.java:74)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.interceptor.reader.InterceptorMetadataReader.getPlainInterceptorMetadata(InterceptorMetadataReader.java:64)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InterceptionModelInitializer.initClassDeclaredEjbInterceptors(InterceptionModelInitializer.java:233)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InterceptionModelInitializer.initEjbInterceptors(InterceptionModelInitializer.java:217)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InterceptionModelInitializer.init(InterceptionModelInitializer.java:103)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BeanInjectionTarget.buildInterceptionModel(BeanInjectionTarget.java:93)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BeanInjectionTarget.initializeInterceptionModel(BeanInjectionTarget.java:88)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.BeanInjectionTarget.initializeAfterBeanDiscovery(BeanInjectionTarget.java:98)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InjectionTargetInitializationContext.initialize(InjectionTargetInitializationContext.java:42)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InjectionTargetService.addInjectionTargetToBeInitialized(InjectionTargetService.java:55)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.injection.producer.InjectionTargetService.addInjectionTargetToBeInitialized(InjectionTargetService.java:49)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.initialize(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:145)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:92)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:80)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:70)
>> at
>> org.jboss.weld.manager.InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.createInjectionTarget(InjectionTargetFactoryImpl.java:54)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jozef Hartinger <jharting at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What I meant was that your PlainInterceptorFactory should in this case,
>>> instead of calling createInterceptorInjectionTarget(), call
>>>
>>> beanManager.createInjectionTargetBuilder(type)
>>>     .setDecorationEnabled(false)
>>>     .setInterceptionEnabled(false)
>>>     .setTargetClassLifecycleCallbacksEnabled(false)
>>>     .setResourceInjectionEnabled(true)
>>>     .build()
>>>
>>>  The InjectionTarget you get should be the same except for resource
>>> injection which will be provided by Weld.
>>>
>>> Jozef
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/03/2015 11:25 AM, Emily Jiang wrote:
>>>
>>>> I might have missed your point. Please elaborate a bit more.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Emily
>> =================
>> Emily Jiang
>> ejiang at apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> ejiang at apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Emily
=================
Emily Jiang
ejiang at apache.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/attachments/20150604/9cbe621f/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the weld-dev mailing list