[weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
Martin Kouba
mkouba at redhat.com
Tue Oct 17 10:14:12 EDT 2017
Dne 17.10.2017 v 16:01 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Back to my original question, TestGroups.SE is not supposed to be run by
> an application server such as Wildfly, Glassfish, Liberty, right?
Yes.
> For certifying EE8, these tests are supposed to be excluded by JavaEE
> runtimes?
Yes. A Java EE runtime TCK runner should not include the tests from this
group.
> Are these tests only for JavaSE runtime such as Hammock?
TestGroups.SE is supposed to be run by a CDI implementation itself.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Matej Novotny <manovotn at redhat.com>
> To: Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com>
> Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>, Emily Jiang
> <EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com>, Weld <weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 17/10/2017 14:17
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Sorry for later answer, yea the only TCK test is the one which Martin
> pointed to.
> However, I don't see much need to cover this particular case on EE part.
> The section of the spec which defines throwing ISE with multiple
> providers belongs to SE part of the spec, so it feel natural that it's
> tested there.
>
> Though if you feel like we should have even EE test then by all means
> feel free to create JIRA ticket for this and I'll eventually get to it.
>
> Matej
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba at redhat.com>
> > To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament at gmail.com>, "Emily Jiang"
> <EMIJIANG at uk.ibm.com>, "Weld" <weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:53:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
> >
> > Dne 16.10.2017 v 20:30 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM Martin Kouba <mkouba at redhat.com
> > > <mailto:mkouba at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Emily,
> > >
> > > tests from TestGroups.SE should NOT be run in a Java EE
> environment.
> > > Note that CDI Bootstrap API should not even work in a Java EE
> container
> > > (SeContainerInitializer.newInstance() should throw
> > > IllegalStateException).
> > >
> > >
> > > Isn't there a TCK test for that?
> >
> > I think not. There is a test in CDI API which verifies that
> > IllegalStateException is thrown if none or multiple service providers
> > are found [1]. But it's actually a good idea to create a new TCK test
> > with TestGroups.INTEGRATION group to verify ISE is thrown in a Java EE
> > container.
> >
> > M
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cdi-2Dspec_cdi_blob_master_api_src_test_java_org_jboss_cdi_api_test_se_SeContainerInitializerTest.java&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=jt2y5_gH2oPaja8Vt6NzAZV-iEo6D2jiWeuVYs0H-1U&m=I-wCdin9dELdurPsIgviW7msB3rHLauyQkEtuCi92lY&s=a27X8Pl3e9WrQ7pr8wED7YuL4Jst6Px1uEBdmCUhxGg&e=
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Dne 16.10.2017 v 14:33 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > > Hi Matej/Martin,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking at the CDI 2.0 tck on JavaSE. I saw they are
> under the
> > > > groups of "SE". Should the tcks be exercised by JavaEE
> runtime, e.g.
> > > > wildfly, glassfish, Liberty etc? Which profile did you
> package the
> > > > JavaSE tck?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > > Emily
> > > > ===========================
> > > > Emily Jiang
> > > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development
> Lead
> > > >
> > > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 <tel:+44%201962%20816278> Internal:
> > > > 246278
> > > >
> > > > Email: emijiang at uk.ibm.com <mailto:emijiang at uk.ibm.com>
> > > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM at IBMGB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
> with
> > > number
> > > > 741598.
> > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> > > Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > > weld-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > > >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mailman_listinfo_weld-2Ddev&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=jt2y5_gH2oPaja8Vt6NzAZV-iEo6D2jiWeuVYs0H-1U&m=I-wCdin9dELdurPsIgviW7msB3rHLauyQkEtuCi92lY&s=K9UrTNcmNV9c0fHxKjz3lv1vmZaVoutqhQam-ceyOoU&e=
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Kouba
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mailman_listinfo_weld-2Ddev&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=jt2y5_gH2oPaja8Vt6NzAZV-iEo6D2jiWeuVYs0H-1U&m=I-wCdin9dELdurPsIgviW7msB3rHLauyQkEtuCi92lY&s=K9UrTNcmNV9c0fHxKjz3lv1vmZaVoutqhQam-ceyOoU&e=
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mailman_listinfo_weld-2Ddev&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=jt2y5_gH2oPaja8Vt6NzAZV-iEo6D2jiWeuVYs0H-1U&m=I-wCdin9dELdurPsIgviW7msB3rHLauyQkEtuCi92lY&s=K9UrTNcmNV9c0fHxKjz3lv1vmZaVoutqhQam-ceyOoU&e=
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
More information about the weld-dev
mailing list