[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-311) Producer field behavior differs from producer method
Pete Muir (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Dec 9 13:59:29 EST 2009
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12499110#action_12499110 ]
Pete Muir commented on WELD-311:
--------------------------------
Oops, here is the test http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/weld/?cs=5255
> Producer field behavior differs from producer method
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WELD-311
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-311
> Project: Weld
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Producers (Methods, Fields and Disposers)
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0.CR1
> Environment: Ubuntu 9.10, Java 6.
> Reporter: alberto Gori
> Assignee: Pete Muir
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
>
>
> This producer field inject a Temp object into the request scope, corretly.
> @Named @SessionScoped
> public class HelloWorld implements Serializable {
>
> @Produces @RequestScoped @TenTemp
> public Temp getTemp() {
> return new Temp(10);
> }
> }
> The same producer written as a field create a session scoped object (note that the main bean is session scoped too) instead of request scoped.
> @Named @SessionScoped
> public class HelloWorld implements Serializable {
>
> @Produces @RequestScoped @TenTemp Temp t = new Temp(10);
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the weld-issues
mailing list