[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-335) RIBean needs new definition of equality

Pete Muir (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Dec 9 14:04:36 EST 2009

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12499111#action_12499111 ] 

Pete Muir commented on WELD-335:

Patch looks technically, though we should cache this info on the AnnotatedType (I think).

However I'm still not convinced by this approach. I am away until Monday, I will mull it over :-)

BTW I assume you run the full incontainer test run?

> RIBean needs new definition of equality
> ---------------------------------------
>                 Key: WELD-335
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-335
>             Project: Weld
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Class Beans (Managed and Session), Producers (Methods, Fields and Disposers), Reflection layer
>            Reporter: Stuart Douglas
>            Assignee: Stuart Douglas
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
>         Attachments: ri-bean-id-creator.patch
> Due to the implementation of equals/hashCode in RIBean only one ManagedBean is allowed per underlying java class, so for example if you use the SPI to add two AnnotatedTypes with the same underlying class but different qualifiers only one will get installed.
> The following patch fixes this, would it be possible to get some feedback on it?
> The AnnotatedTypeIdProvider class in the patch can also be used to implement meaningful equlity for WeldAnnotated*

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


More information about the weld-issues mailing list