[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDITCK-84) Producer field and producer method tests that use generics contain ambiguous definitions

[Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12499816#action_12499816 ] 

Marius Bogoevici commented on CDITCK-84:
----------------------------------------

(continuing from above)

So, there is no producer in the case above - although in other situations the problem is created by producers, as in:

org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.definition.ProducerFieldDefinitionTest (FunnelWeaver)

org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.method.definition.ProducerMethodDefinitionTest (FunnelWeaver as well)

The whole background of the discussion is to be found here:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/weld-dev/2009-December/002025.html



> Producer field and producer method tests that use generics contain ambiguous definitions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDITCK-84
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-84
>             Project: CDI TCK
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0.GA
>            Reporter: Marius Bogoevici
>            Assignee: Marius Bogoevici
>             Fix For: 1.1.0.CR1
>
>
> For example org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.typesafe.resolution.ResolutionByTypeTest, where Farmer<ScottishFish> references are to be resolved by both the producer and the managed bean created from Farmer<T>. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira