[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDITCK-134) Decorator not applied to a passivation capable bean

[Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12526949#action_12526949 ] 

Gurkan Erdogdu commented on CDITCK-134:
---------------------------------------

Yes, it is a passivation capable via Serializable, but we do not validate it because 

1* RequestScoped is not passivation capable scope
2* Bean is not injected into any other bean in the TCK test

Therefore, it does not trigger validation at startup. Why would we validate bean at startup cost if we know that it is not injected
in any bean that has passivation capable scope?

> Decorator not applied to a passivation capable bean
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDITCK-134
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-134
>             Project: CDI TCK
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>          Components: Tests
>            Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
>            Assignee: David Allen
>             Fix For: 1.0.2.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
>
>
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingBeanConstructor
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInitializerMethod
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.broken.decoratorWithNonPassivatingInjectedField
> These packages tests decorator injection points to check if they are passivation capable dependency or not, however the decorator is not applied to a passivation capable bean

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira