[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-335) RIBean needs new definition of equality
Stuart Douglas (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Fri Jan 8 07:02:30 EST 2010
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12502938#action_12502938 ]
Stuart Douglas commented on WELD-335:
-------------------------------------
What about if the id only contains annotation information if the effective annotations are different to the class level annotations?
So beans that are discovered in the normal bean discovery processes (and not modified by a PE) will still have just the classname, while beans added by an extension will have an id that contains all the annotation information.
> RIBean needs new definition of equality
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: WELD-335
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-335
> Project: Weld
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Class Beans (Managed and Session), Producers (Methods, Fields and Disposers), Reflection layer
> Reporter: Stuart Douglas
> Assignee: Stuart Douglas
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
>
> Attachments: ri-bean-id-creator.patch, ri-bean-id-creator2.patch
>
>
> Due to the implementation of equals/hashCode in RIBean only one ManagedBean is allowed per underlying java class, so for example if you use the SPI to add two AnnotatedTypes with the same underlying class but different qualifiers only one will get installed.
> The following patch fixes this, would it be possible to get some feedback on it?
> The AnnotatedTypeIdProvider class in the patch can also be used to implement meaningful equlity for WeldAnnotated*
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the weld-issues
mailing list