[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-372) Consider whether we should treat AnnotatedClass definitions which do exactly mirror the reflected class definition as an error

[Pete Muir (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12503919#action_12503919 ] 

Pete Muir commented on WELD-372:
--------------------------------

Cases like that should be an error.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
What about the case like:

class Foo {

  Foo(String foo, String bar, String baz) {}
}

but the AnnotatedType specifies a constructor with only two parameters. Options I see:

a) Weld does some magic and calls the third parameter with null (for example)
b) Weld errors at runtime
c) We detect the error at boot

IMO (c) is most friendly.


> Consider whether we should treat AnnotatedClass definitions which do exactly mirror the reflected class definition as an error
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WELD-372
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-372
>             Project: Weld
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API
>            Reporter: Pete Muir
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira