[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (WELD-521) Introduce a way to exclude classes or packages from scanning

[Morten Christensen (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12535285#action_12535285 ] 

Morten Christensen commented on WELD-521:
-----------------------------------------

I do not agree with your premise. Generalities that are both very expressive and at the same time also simple is one aspect of "beautiful" designs (e.x. "e=m*c^2" from physics). I am not saying that static properties are comparable to this example but they are both simple and expressive.

> Introduce a way to exclude classes or packages from scanning
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WELD-521
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-521
>             Project: Weld
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API
>         Environment: Java SE and Java EE + weld
>            Reporter: Morten Christensen
>         Attachments: weld-se-ee-passifier.jar
>
>
> Better support for dual SE and EE applications. I have some weld-using jar's that can be deployed on a Java EE and work standalone. It is possible to get this to work using both weld SE and weld EE but it is a pain. F.x. when deployed under glassfish weld will fail unless I include a few weld SE dummy classes.... Weld should either combine weld SE and weld EE OR there should at least be some support for having weld ignoring some of my classes/packages depending on which environment it is running under.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira