[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDITCK-149) Bug in org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.NormalContextTest

Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed May 5 11:49:07 EDT 2010


    [ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12529118#action_12529118 ] 

Gurkan Erdogdu commented on CDITCK-149:
---------------------------------------

Spec section, 

6.6.1
A custom implementation of Bean is passivation capable if it implements the interface PassivationCapable. An imple-
mentation of Contextual that is not a bean is passivation capable if it implements both PassivationCapable and Serial-
izable.

"I think that "This is passed in Weld" because of Weld Bean default extends PassivationCapable" that is not required

6.6.4
For every bean which declares a passivating scope, ....., the container must validate that the
bean truly is passivation capable ........


> Bug in org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.NormalContextTest
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDITCK-149
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-149
>             Project: CDI TCK
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) 
>            Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
>
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.MyContextual is a SessionScoped bean.As spec section 6.6.4 it must be passivation capable, but it is not. therefore it throws Definition exception

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the weld-issues mailing list