[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (CDI-70) Clarify that if an extension provides an Annotated* then it is considered "metadata complete"

Pete Muir (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Tue Jan 25 11:44:49 EST 2011


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Pete Muir updated CDI-70:
-------------------------

    Description: 
I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all. If the parameters for a method or a constructor don't match the underlying class, it should be considered a definition error.


  was:
I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all.




> Clarify that if an extension provides an Annotated* then it is considered "metadata complete"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-70
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Pete Muir
>
> I think the correct behavior is to ignore any members that are missing from the AnnotatedType. You should not be directly accessing the reflection API at all. If the parameters for a method or a constructor don't match the underlying class, it should be considered a definition error.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the weld-issues mailing list