[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (CDITCK-215) ProcessSessionBeanTest testProcessSessionBeanEvent count
Pete Muir (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon Jun 13 06:24:23 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608191#comment-12608191 ]
Pete Muir commented on CDITCK-215:
----------------------------------
Gurkan, suggest you raise this on the cdi-dev list..
> ProcessSessionBeanTest testProcessSessionBeanEvent count
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CDITCK-215
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215
> Project: CDI TCK
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
> Reporter: David Blevins
> Assignee: Pete Muir
>
> [Side note maybe there should be versions for 1.0.4.SP1 and 1.0.4.SP2]
> Test: org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.processBean.ProcessSessionBeanTest.testProcessSessionBeanEvent
> Not sure if this is an issue or not, so filling this as a bug and not a challenge. The test essentially has two observer methods and is asserting that only one of them are called.
> public void observeElephantSessionBean(@Observes ProcessSessionBean<Elephant> event)
> {
> ProcessBeanObserver.elephantProcessSessionBean = event;
> }
> public void observeElephantBean(@Observes ProcessBean<Elephant> event)
> {
> ProcessBeanObserver.elephantProcessBeanCount++;
> }
> Specifically the test asserts that observeElephantSessionBean is called and that observeElephantBean is not called.
> Currently we call both because ProcessSessionBean is assignable to ProcessBean and the generics are the same.
> Is there a part of the spec that mandates only the most specific observer method is called?
> The only thing I can find is in 10.4 which says pretty clearly:
> There may be arbitrarily many observer methods with the same event parameter type and qualifiers.
> A bean (or extension) may declare multiple observer methods.
> Well I guess it's not that clear as it says essentially "this may happen" rather than "this may happen...and when it does the behavior is...[all are invoked || only the most specific is invoked]"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the weld-issues
mailing list