[wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of precedence

[Rebecca Searls]

I'm trying to understand the nature of how this works.   I have not found any information in the documentation about
the rules under which these 2 files are processed by AS7/WildFly.  If MANIFEST.MF is present is it always processed
first?  Who wins when there are conflicting rules like the one I described?  


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>
> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls at redhat.com>
> Cc: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml order of precedence
> 
> Don't do that.
> 
> Pretty sure the remove will take precedence but I don't think this is
> something we should consider supported behavior.
> 
> Stuart
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > What if manifest.mf adds a dependency and jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > removes it?
> > Is manifest.mf processes first?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>
> > > To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:37:19 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] manifest.mf jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > order of precedence
> > >
> > > If both are present both sets of dependencies will be added to the
> > > deployment.
> > >
> > > Stuart
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Rebecca Searls <rsearls at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there are order of precedence if both a manifest.mf
> > > > jboss-deployment-structure.xml
> > > > are present in an archive?  Does one override the other?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > > > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > > >
> > >
> >
>