[wildfly-dev] package name change a good idea?

[Tomaž Cerar]

We never said we are going to be renaming existing packages.
Especially because we don't want to break compatibly or make back porting
harder.

What we did agree on is that new stuff should be in new package names.
Old packages could be renamed only when the got some big upgrade/change
that would break compatibility anyway.

--
tomaz





On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com> wrote:

> Are you sure a package name change is a good idea?  Won't it make it
> harder to pull/push changes upstream and downstream?  And create
> additional work for those who already are the bottleneck in the release
> process?  What does Fedora/RHEL do?
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20130502/529d6e57/attachment.html