[wildfly-dev] package name change a good idea?

[Jaromir Hamala]

That makes sense then. Thanks for the explanation!

Jaromir

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Brian Stansberry <
brian.stansberry at redhat.com> wrote:

> No. WildFly will be the upstream for a future release of EAP. When that
> happens, those classes, in the existing org.wildfly packages, will be
> used in EAP.
>
> This is conceptually no different than cases where packages like
> org.apache appear in EAP. EAP is a product that is built from a variety
> of upstream projects. WildFly is one of those upstream projects. This
> was the case before the rename as well; the project fka JBoss AS was
> just one of the upstream projects in EAP.
>
> On 5/2/13 7:10 AM, Jaromir Hamala wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does it mean the same classes will be under different packages in EAP
> > and WildFly? Wouldn't this make a transition from WildFly to EAP harder?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jaromir
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar at gmail.com
> > <mailto:tomaz.cerar at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     We never said we are going to be renaming existing packages.
> >     Especially because we don't want to break compatibly or make back
> >     porting harder.
> >
> >     What we did agree on is that new stuff should be in new package
> names.
> >     Old packages could be renamed only when the got some big
> >     upgrade/change that would break compatibility anyway.
> >
> >     --
> >     tomaz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Bill Burke <bburke at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:bburke at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Are you sure a package name change is a good idea?  Won't it
> make it
> >         harder to pull/push changes upstream and downstream?  And create
> >         additional work for those who already are the bottleneck in the
> >         release
> >         process?  What does Fedora/RHEL do?
> >         --
> >         Bill Burke
> >         JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >         http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         wildfly-dev mailing list
> >         wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     wildfly-dev mailing list
> >     wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
> > there is nothing left to take away.”
> > Antoine de Saint Exupéry
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
>
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Principal Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>



-- 
“Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
there is nothing left to take away.”
Antoine de Saint Exupéry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20130502/8131f8a8/attachment.html