[wildfly-dev] Classpath management for as7.2 / eap6.1 / wildfly
David M. Lloyd
david.lloyd at redhat.com
Tue May 7 09:26:24 EDT 2013
On 05/07/2013 07:25 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> From what I know of our current schedule, I'm afraid you should not
>> count on this for the 8.0.0.Alpha1 release.
>
> Okey - but we need *something* for AS 7.1+/EAP 6.0+ ..or you should be ok
> with us "guessing" the list of jars to add...
>
> Is there anyway we can figure out the jar location for a set of jars
> based on a list of module names ? i.e. one that you guys would not call
> "broken and not supported" ? :)
> i.e. a "jboss module/AS aware jar locator"
>
> I'm thinking we get our eclipse tooling to understand module names and
> then use this locator
> to get the proper jars would be a great start.
>
> Then add ons like the txt in root of distribution can be tweaked out on
> top of this.
> (since we would need this 'locator' for the txt file anyway - especially
> with layering and patching
> being added making hardcoded fileset's not good)
>
> Would that be doable ?
Possible, but a lot more work than #1/#2 that I've mentioned, and may
require resources that are already booked up. Is there any reason the
two suggestions I made would not suffice? Putting things in the
filesystem is a trivial effort compared to creating APIs that have to be
supported.
> /max
>
>>
>> The solutions which seem applicable to your concerns which Max and Brian
>> and I talked about included the following:
>>
>> 1. A single top-level txt file whose complete content is the release
>> name e.g. "WildFly 8" or "JBoss EAP 6.2" etc. (this should be easy)
>> 2. Packaging JBDS Facet definitions in a well-defined place which
>> includes the class path information for each technology
>>
>> We can definitely do #1 without any substantial effort. For #2 we would
>> definitely count on input from you guys (we have no idea what these
>> definitions look like, though it does seem clear we'd have to use build
>> information in part to generate these files to ensure the exact JAR
>> paths (or at least Maven GAV) are properly specified).
>>
>> Do you have any expectations beyond what I've listed here?
>>
>> --
>> - DML
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
- DML
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list