[wildfly-dev] AppClientXml - Post Code Split

Eduardo Martins emartins at redhat.com
Tue Aug 5 12:26:31 EDT 2014


IMHO app client xml should use a config template like standalone and domain, and be filled with specific subsystem supplements.

—E

On 05 Aug 2014, at 17:07, Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse at jboss.com> wrote:

> After forward porting some schema changes from EAP to WildFly it has 
> become apparent that it is a little cumbersome to work with AppClientXml 
> as it's implementation is dependent on the schema definitions in 
> wildfly-core and yet it lives in wildfly.
> 
> The first point I realise is that the root element parsed by 
> AppClientXml is 'server' however it only accepts a subset of the 
> elements defined as supported by the 'server' element.  Could it make 
> sense for version 3 of the schema and onward to have a new root element 
> 'client'?
> 
> Secondly this could open up the option to have the client element 
> defined in a schema in wildfly and just reference the types that are in 
> wildfly-core.  wildfly would then contain the parsing code for client 
> and the parsing code for the referenced types would be in wildfly-core 
> and accessed through an agreed API that we maintain for compatibility.
> 
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev




More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list