[wildfly-dev] AppClientXml - Post Code Split

Darran Lofthouse darran.lofthouse at jboss.com
Tue Aug 5 13:16:45 EDT 2014


Just to split this into two decisions: -

Is there any reason the root element needs to be 'server' even though 
the server definition differs depending on what is parsing it or should 
we add a new root element 'client'?

On 05/08/14 17:26, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/14 17:20, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> On 8/5/14, 11:07 AM, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>>> After forward porting some schema changes from EAP to WildFly it has
>>> become apparent that it is a little cumbersome to work with AppClientXml
>>> as it's implementation is dependent on the schema definitions in
>>> wildfly-core and yet it lives in wildfly.
>>>
>>> The first point I realise is that the root element parsed by
>>> AppClientXml is 'server' however it only accepts a subset of the
>>> elements defined as supported by the 'server' element.  Could it make
>>> sense for version 3 of the schema and onward to have a new root element
>>> 'client'?
>>>
>>> Secondly this could open up the option to have the client element
>>> defined in a schema in wildfly and just reference the types that are in
>>> wildfly-core.  wildfly would then contain the parsing code for client
>>> and the parsing code for the referenced types would be in wildfly-core
>>> and accessed through an agreed API that we maintain for compatibility.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps. I know it's wrong but I'm tempted to pull the whole thing into
>> core. I don't much like having core parsing stuff as part of the API
>> exposed by core.
>
> Yeah feel the same on that one, trying to find a solution that isn't wrong.
>
>> If we add an API it needs to be really coarse grained.
>
> Yes I was thinking something corse grained to the level of: -
>     parseProfile()
>     parseSocketBindings()
>
> Each of these methods would then need to be responsible for their own
> version check.
>
>> The only tie this class has to anything outside of core is one logger
>> message that at a glance looks like something that probably already
>> exists in core.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list