[wildfly-dev] Is JMX Needed in Core?

[Tomaž Cerar]

Just an update on whole JMX subsystem move thingy.

It is on halt for now, as there is some work going on that in affects JMX
and it is easier to have it in same code repo for time beeing

I will be moved once this is complete.

--
tomaz


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jeff Mesnil <jmesnil at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 24 Jul 2014, at 17:43, Tomaž Cerar <tomaz.cerar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have send PR removing jmx subsystem from core
> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-core/pull/57
> >
> > but to send PR for inclusion to full WildFly repo new release of core is
> needed as jmx subsystem is using new transformers API we have in core.
>
> It’s a minor thing but our jconsole.* scripts still live in wildfly repo.
> For consistency sake, we should have them in the same repo than the jmx
> subsystem.
>
> No need to do anything if we move back jmx to wildfly soon.
> But if we decide to keep jmx in wildfly-core, we should move the jconsole
> scripts there too.
>
> jeff
>
> --
> Jeff Mesnil
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://jmesnil.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20140811/2947c123/attachment.html