[wildfly-dev] Favour jboss-persistence.xml if present
Scott Marlow
smarlow at redhat.com
Wed Jan 29 16:33:45 EST 2014
On 01/29/2014 04:24 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> On 1/29/14, 3:20 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>> On 01/29/2014 03:17 PM, Jason Greene wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 01/29/2014 02:44 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>>>> On 01/29/2014 01:39 PM, Klein, Christopher wrote:
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>> I already filled out a feature request in JIRA (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2816).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have the situation that our development environment (currently JBoss AS 7.1.1) differs from the production instance (WebSphere 8.5). Our persistence.xml has to be adjusted for production environment: different jta-data-source, different properties. The dirty solution for this problem would be to generate separate build artifacts for both environments. As you can imagine I don't like the idea of having two binaries just because of a few different settings. Other options (WildFly or WebSphere specific JPA properties; extending Hibernate persistence provider) do not work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A much nicer solution would be: WildFly checks on deployment process for the existence of a jboss-persistence.xml. If it does, the jboss-persistence.xml is used for configuring the JPA subsystem. Otherwise it falls back to the standard persistence.xml. The jboss-persistence.xml would use the XML schema from persistence.xml.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I lookup into the WildFly sources and this change should be an easy patch which I would provide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So here are my questsions:
>>>>>> 1. Are you generally interested in accepting such a pull request or is it a feature you don't want?
>>>>>> 2. Does another solution exists to my problem apart from generating different artifacts which makes this pull request needless?
>>>>>
>>>>> It sounds like a reasonable idea that actually applies generally. If I
>>>>> recall correctly, we have something of a mix today of descriptors which
>>>>> override versus supplementing existing configuration. But overall the
>>>>> unofficial policy for new descriptors has been to add them in to
>>>>> jboss-all.xml as subdescriptors, FWIW.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure that jboss-all.xml would be a good place for the
>>>> persistence unit definitions.
>>>
>>> I would agree that this is probably impractical.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that the proposed jboss-persistence.xml (or
>>>> wildfly-persistence.xml) could be helpful for anyone that wants to only
>>>> develop on WildFly but deploy on other application servers. I suppose
>>>> this could help someone that wants to migrate off of WildFly as well (to
>>>> prepare for a switch to something else). Is that what you mean by the
>>>> proposed solution applying generally?
>>>
>>> It does sound a lot like a vendor specific alt-dd feature. We have some other solutions as well that might be relevant:
>>>
>>> 1) Deployment overlay feature - This allows you to override the descriptors in a deployment without modifying the deployment. These are added in a separate management op with a match pattern, and preserved outside the lifecycle of the deployment. Available in WildFly 8 and EAP 6.2 (can’t recall if it made EAP 6.1).
>>
>> I was just reading
>> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY8/Deployment+Overlays but I'm
>> not sure that would help with this use case. Since the deployment will
>> fail due to the persistence.xml targeting WebSphere (persistence unit
>> property "hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class" is set to
>> "org.hibernate.transaction.WebSphereExtendedJTATransactionLookup").
>>
>
> The persistence.xml that is the deployment overlay would not include
> those settings. The deployment overlay feature hides the original
> persistence.xml in the deployment archive from the deployment
> processors; they only see the overlay.
Thanks Brian, I missed that the deployment overlay is created before
deploying. So that could help someone crack open an archive and replace
the persistence.xml with one that will work.
>
>> What might help is if we could ignore (or auto-magically remove during
>> deployment) certain persistence unit property settings that we know will
>> cause the deployment to fail.
>>
>>>
>>> 2) Property Substituion - There is a flag you can optionally enable in standalone/domain.xml that allows descriptors to contain property expressions. However, this only works for this use case if all venders are using the same expression language (unlikely). I just thought I would mention it.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason T. Greene
>>> WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list