[wildfly-dev] Management Model: Squatter Resources
Heiko Braun
hbraun at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 11:51:14 EDT 2014
I agree with jason. I think 'polymorphism' is a misleading term. The child resources are distinct types.
On 30 Oct 2014, at 15:06, Jason Greene <jason.greene at redhat.com> wrote:
> Is it really polymorphism though if you do not share attributes or operations?
>
> It sounds like these are all distinct types just sharing the same portion of an address.
>
> The primary justification for this modeling approach seems to be:
>
> 1) Avoid the user having to assign a name
> 2) Enforce a single occurrence of a “type”
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20141030/2d4137d4/attachment.html
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list