[wildfly-dev] Question on version of wildfly-protocol jars

Rob Stryker rstryker at redhat.com
Sat Jun 6 14:42:09 EDT 2015


Yeah, I was aware that this was due to the core split. Didn't notice the 
groupid difference though, so just thought it was possible some others 
might be confused.

Thanks, though.

- Rob Stryker

On 06/06/2015 05:13 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> With wildfly 9 we split code to wildfly and wildfly-core.
> Protocol jar you are talking about is part of wildfly core and as such 
> has version of the core and not of full app server.
>
> If you look at maven coordinates you will see that protocol jar in 9+ 
> has groupid org.wildfly.core instead of org.wildfly it had in older 
> versions.
>
> Tomaz
>
> Sent from my Phone
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Rob Stryker <mailto:rstryker at redhat.com>
> Sent: ‎6.‎6.‎2015 6:38
> To: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Question on version of wildfly-protocol jars
>
> Hey all:
>
> Here's a table of wf releases and what protocol jar version it has.  I 
> was just curious if there was a discussion on this, and going 
> backwards in version was intentional?  Is there anyone (customers, 
> clients, etc) out there likely to be confused by this? Or are we just 
> considering it internal details and not relevant?
>
> Wildfly Release
> 	wildfly-protocol jar version
> 8.0
> 	wildfly-protocol-8.0.0.Final.jar
> 8.1
> 	wildfly-protocol-8.1.0.Final.jar
> 9.0.CR1
> 	wildfly-protocol-1.0.0.CR1.jar
> EAP7 DR3
> 	wildfly-protocol-2.0.0.Alpha3.jar
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20150606/d3b2e379/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list