[wildfly-dev] [keycloak-dev] 2 places to edit modules now?
Stan Silvert
ssilvert at redhat.com
Tue Jun 16 09:24:50 EDT 2015
On 6/16/2015 8:36 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> A feature-pack can extend another feature pack,
> I am sure you guys know that.
>
> so you could have "keycloak-base" feature pack that all other 3 extend.
>
> the base would than have all common modules defined.
> and other 3 extra specializations.
That's an OK approach if there is a well-defined base of modules that
several projects use. But that's really not the case.
In any feature pack I should be able to just list the artifacts I'm
using and it provides a default module.xml file for that.
>
> --
> tomaz
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com
> <mailto:ssilvert at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Cross-posting to wildfly-dev.
>
> It sounds like we need a way to standardize module.xml definitions
> across projects and have them accessible from maven GAV's. These
> module.xml files are rarely different between projects and it doesn't
> make sense for each feature pack to define its own copy.
>
> On 6/15/2015 4:08 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> > Module definition is now done in 3 places? Copies of one another?
> >
> > eap6-service-overlay
> > server-feature-pack
> > adapter-feature-pack
> >
> > This is very very error prone guys. I guarantee somebody will
> forget to
> > update something.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20150616/5e01dadb/attachment.html
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list