[wildfly-dev] WF10 Deployment Changes

Max Rydahl Andersen manderse at redhat.com
Tue Mar 17 13:30:05 EDT 2015


I'm trying to grok what impact this have on endusers ?

do they need to wait longer/less/same as before when certain 
changes/deployments occur ?

/max

> Currently we are a bit inconsistent with whether or not partial 
> deployment services are allowed to restart. This is because most 
> require metadata that is intended to be temporary and is intended to 
> be wiped out at the end of deployment. A major exception is JPA which 
> is holding on to jandex annotation indexes, so that if its underlying 
> JCA datasource bounces, it's able to restart.
>
> This is bad though because it wastes more memory than is actually 
> needed (the state that JPA requires is less than the combined state of 
> all annotation indexes and other deployment info). It's particular bad 
> when we upgrade to jandex 2 since it stores a lot more information 
> (generics, all method and field signatures, type annotations etc).
>
> IMO based on this inconsistency and the time we have on the schedule, 
> I think we need to momentarily suspend the not really attained goal of 
> partial restart-ability. We should change JPA to stop keeping a hard 
> reference to the indexes, and once that service goes down, a full 
> redeployment is required. Stuart has a hack that can restart this 
> automatically as part of a listener. We should probably look at 
> extending this further.
>
> Longer term I think we need to redesign the deployment service 
> hierarchy to better represent the reality that restarting a portion 
> deployment requires rerunning the initial scanning phases.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev


/max
http://about.me/maxandersen


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list