[wildfly-dev] update on WildFly NoSQL prototype integration...

[Scott Marlow]

On 05/12/2016 08:13 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> If OGM should be able to work with connections managed by the container,
> some sort of "neutral" SPI is needed IMO. Otherwise we'd have to create
> some sort of abstraction *in* OGM to ensure it still can be used in
> other environments than WF.

This makes sense, thanks!

>
> I think best would be to start with a PoC and see things are going to
> look like. Then we still can decide where it'd be best located or
> whether it's better to avoid re-use and accept some duplication.

+1

>
>
>
>
> 2016-05-12 13:24 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org
> <mailto:emmanuel at hibernate.org>>:
>
>
>
>     On 11 mai 2016, at 16:02, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com
>     <mailto:smarlow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     >> Hibernate OGM should still be usable without WF; So maybe there should
>     >> be a separate project/repo which defines an SPI to obtain/manage
>     >> connections and implementations for different NoSQL stores?
>     >
>     > Excellent suggestion,  perhaps the SPI could be under
>     > https://github.com/jboss, which is a common area for sharing.  Possible
>     > locations for creating the per NoSQL store implementations could be
>     > https://github.com/jboss or https://github.com/hibernate or
>     > https://github.com/wildfly.
>
>     I'm starting to think that this might be way overkill. If we are
>     creating a sub project just to share between 20 and 50 lines of code
>     per provider and the overhead code to abstract property
>     configuration to plus OGM and WF ones, we are losing more than gaining.
>
>     Thoughts ?
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     wildfly-dev mailing list
>     wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>