[wildfly-dev] Mixing org.jboss.as and org.wildfly packages
Stuart Douglas
stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com
Thu Apr 6 17:12:56 EDT 2017
Yes, I am only talking about existing test suite modules that are already
using the org.jboss.as package.
For example in integration/basic we now have
'org.wildfly.test.integration.ejb' and 'org.jboss.as.test.integration.ejb',
which are logically the same package, but now you have two different places
to look for ejb tests.
Stuart
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Kabir Khan <kabir.khan at jboss.com> wrote:
> If you are specifically talking about the testsuite/elytron module, I
> believe we can leave those under org.wildfly.test.integration.elytron.
> Stuart's gripe, as I read it, is mixing of the two packages within a module.
> > On 6 Apr 2017, at 07:56, Josef Cacek <jcacek at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think, Tomaz should share his view (CC-ing)
> >
> > During our discussion related to Elytron testing, his preference was to
> use org.wildfly package names.
> >
> > -- Josef
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com>
> >> To: wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 3:45:59 AM
> >> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Mixing org.jboss.as and org.wildfly packages
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> So this is a minor issue, but it annoys me so I thought I would see what
> >> other people think about it. In the test suite I have noticed that some
> new
> >> code is being added under the org.wildfly package, even though all the
> >> existing code is still under org.jboss.as .
> >>
> >> I don't think this is a good idea, as it means there is two potential
> places
> >> to look for something, with no real reason why something is in a
> particular
> >> package other than the date it was added.
> >>
> >> I propose that we move all the org.wildfly code into org.jboss.as to
> keep
> >> everything consistent (moving everything to org.wildfly would also be an
> >> option, but it has implications for backporting and has the potential to
> >> create a lot more work).
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any objections to this? If not I will prepare some
> PR's.
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wildfly-dev mailing list
> >> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > wildfly-dev mailing list
> > wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20170407/667e049b/attachment-0001.html
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list