[wildfly-dev] Wildfly layers
Carlo de Wolf
cdewolf at redhat.com
Wed Dec 5 06:12:59 EST 2018
Hehe, I meant become fully optional. EAP users might still wish to
install it.
Carlo
On 05-12-18 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
> Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf at redhat.com
> <mailto:cdewolf at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>
>> Picketbox layer
>>
>> Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency,
>> I am
>> wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be
>> that any
>> dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security
>> layer. Picketbox
>> is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.
>>
>>
>> The independent use is the management vault. Using that shouldn't
>> require everything in the current p-b module though. And arguably
>> you could say that use case means you need the vault tool and
>> thus whatever layer has it. (You don't need the vault tool
>> though, not on the server.)
>>
> Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox
> at all anymore?
>
> Carlo
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20181205/d02275aa/attachment.html
More information about the wildfly-dev
mailing list