[wildfly-dev] Wildfly layers

[Darran Lofthouse]

Do you mean Elytron or the Elytron Subsystem?

I believe yes the subsystem does have that dependency but it is only
temporary until PicketBox is removed.

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM Jean-Francois Denise <jdenise at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Darran,
>
> elytron seems to have a dependency on picketbox for jacc support. Am I
> right?
>
> On 05/12/2018 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
>
> Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>
>> Picketbox layer
>>>
>>> Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency, I am
>>> wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be that any
>>> dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security layer. Picketbox
>>> is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.
>>>
>>
>> The independent use is the management vault. Using that shouldn't require
>> everything in the current p-b module though. And arguably you could say
>> that use case means you need the vault tool and thus whatever layer has it.
>> (You don't need the vault tool though, not on the server.)
>>
>> Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox at all
>> anymore?
>>
>> Carlo
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20181205/bfecd906/attachment.html