[wildfly-dev] Deployment unit runtime-name - must it have a packaging type suffix?

[David Lloyd]

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Brian Stansberry
<brian.stansberry at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:25 AM, David Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I guess I wasn't too clear.  I didn't mean to say there was some other
>> way to detect the type.  I meant to say that the type determination
>> should be done *before* the overridden runtime name is applied, not
>> after.
>
> I'm confused now. :)

Isn't this entire thread about the ability to use the "runtime-name"
attribute to override the actual file name of the JAR?  I'm simply
stating that the type probably should be based on the name of the
content file, not the runtime-name.


-- 
- DML