[wildfly-dev] [WFLY-11031] Add proposal for JSON access logging.

Brian Stansberry brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Thu Apr 18 15:41:32 EDT 2019


On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Perkins <jperkins at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
> It's been longer than I'd want to really get into this, but now that I've
> got a start on it I'd like some feedback on the best way to deal with the
> pattern attribute. For the file it currently just uses a pattern like %h
> %l %u %t %r %s %b %{i,Referer} %{i,User-Agent}. The problem is that
> doesn't really provide a key for the value. What I'm currently using is
> that same pattern and using the ExchangeAttributeBuilder.getName() as the
> key. However if the value of getName() changes at some point the data
> would end up with a different key. This approach doesn't seem ideal.
>
> One option would be to switch to some kind of property format type of
> thing like:
>
> attributes={"remoteHost"="%h", "identityUsername"="%l"}
>
> I'm not sure how user friendly that is though.
>
> The other option would be to limit it to known exchange attributes, but
> that would require a change every time a new attribute is added to Undertow
> itself or we'd have to allow for some kind of custom attribute.
>

> Any opinions are welcome. Ideally we want something user friendly that's
> going to produce consistent keys as that would be part of the structured
> data contract.
>

That pattern string also provides order. I suppose that's not as important
with structured data though.

Perhaps two alternative attributes, one that's a pattern String and then
one that's complex like your example?  The pattern string is documented
with the values it supports and the names of the keys it will use for those
values. (Those keys are set in the WF code, not pulled from
ExchangeAttributeBuilder.) If you want other key names or other values you
have to use the complex attribute.

That's kind of kludgy but it makes the hopefully common case simple.


> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:10 AM James Perkins <jperkins at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>> I've created a proposal [1] for JSON access logging. Any feedback is
>> welcome.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-proposals/pull/176
>>
>> --
>> James R. Perkins
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>
>
>
> --
> James R. Perkins
> JBoss by Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev



-- 
Brian Stansberry
Manager, Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20190418/61a4f8ed/attachment.html 


More information about the wildfly-dev mailing list