[wildfly-dev] Bringing back bouncycastle into WildFly-core

[Darran Lofthouse]

Are the modules flagged as being private?  If so separate modules sounds
easier - otherwise may need something a fraction more complex.

Either that or cut the complexity and just add them both to WildFly Core
even though core only needs one.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:32 PM Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugonne at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Answers are inline:
>
>
> Le 16/03/2020 à 11:02, Darran Lofthouse a écrit :
> > Are they both the same version?
>
>
> Yes, it is just that I need the gpg part in core (for signature) but not
> the bc-mail that is defined in full.
>
>
> >
> > For other projects we have brought in the maven dependencies in
> dependency management in WildFly Core and then just add the additional
> > module definitions to WildFly.
>
>
> Currently there is only one BC module, do I understand correctly that I
> should split the BC module into several ones ?
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:12 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugonne at redhat.com
> <mailto:ehugonne at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello,
> >
> >     While trying to upgrade JGIt I have to bring back bouncy castle libs
> into wildfly-core.
> >
> >     While doing this I noticed that I don't need the same exact libs as
> what is in full  (most notably the mail part).
> >
> >     How do we handle such a case : having a different module in core vs
> full ?
> >
> >     Should we add the mail part in core (maybe optional) or split the
> modules, or just overload in full ?
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >     Emmanuel
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     wildfly-dev mailing list
> >     wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/attachments/20200316/df4aa5e4/attachment.html