<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPhbRDbC-GKjPDjsQQ3B1h8OFmfgSC_YDKVYZNrobGKhxQaz_w@mail.gmail.com">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Picketbox
layer<br>
<br>
Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency, I
am <br>
wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be
that any <br>
dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security layer.
Picketbox <br>
is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet
ms",sans-serif">The independent use is the management
vault. Using that shouldn't require everything in the current
p-b module though. And arguably you could say that use case
means you need the vault tool and thus whatever layer has it.
(You don't need the vault tool though, not on the server.)</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:"trebuchet
ms",sans-serif"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox at
all anymore?<br>
<br>
Carlo<br>
</body>
</html>