[windup-dev] POST pipeline exploration
Rebecca Searls
rsearls at redhat.com
Wed Sep 11 11:10:09 EDT 2013
There are multiple XML and JAVA pipelines in Windup today.
I only just discovered that all the XML pipeline data is merged into a single object. The same for JAVA and POST.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robb Greathouse" <robb.greathouse at redhat.com>
> To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls at redhat.com>
> Cc: windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:06:49 AM
> Subject: Re: POST pipeline exploration
>
> I was working off your statement "if there is more than 1 POST pipeline".
>
> If there is only one pipeline then the pipeline could be control ordering.
> Can it provide a constraint that id's must be unique within the pipeline?
>
> Robb Greathouse
> Partner Enablement
> Middleware Business Unit
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> cellphone 505-507-4906
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > No a pipeline is the top level grouping object.
> > For example an XML pipeline has all the xpath-value rules in it.
> > A JAVA pipleline has all the java-value rules in it. ... etc
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Robb Greathouse" <robb.greathouse at redhat.com>
> > > To: "Rebecca Searls" <rsearls at redhat.com>
> > > Cc: windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:43:26 AM
> > > Subject: Re: POST pipeline exploration
> > >
> > > Could the post pipelines be ordered first and then order the id's?
> > >
> > > Robb Greathouse
> > > Partner Enablement
> > > Middleware Business Unit
> > > JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> > > cellphone 505-507-4906
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >
> > > > As a means of not polluting the existing framework too much but to add
> > > > some
> > > > needed
> > > > flow of control functionality for post processing, I've been playing
> > > > around
> > > > with
> > > > adding a new pipeline, POST. The intent of pipeline POST is to provide
> > > > a
> > > > place
> > > > to add a defined order of post processing of rules flagged during the
> > > > analysis
> > > > phase. I've added attribute "id" to the xpath-value rule. The 'id' is
> > > > ref-ed
> > > > by rules in POST. Within POST "action" rules are provided with 0 or
> > > > more
> > > > ids
> > > > to be associated with an action. A list of actions are processed in
> > > > the
> > > > order they
> > > > are defined.
> > > >
> > > > The problem I am encountering with this design is that all POST
> > > > pipeline
> > > > contents are
> > > > merged into a single POST pipeline class for the analysis phase. This
> > > > can
> > > > be
> > > > a problem if there is more than 1 POST pipeline acting upon the same
> > > > ref
> > > > ID.
> > > > For example if switchyard and airport both altered some_common.xml file
> > > > the
> > > > last one who touched it wins. I don't see any easy way to instruct
> > > > Windup
> > > > to only run switchyard if there are multiple POST pipelines present.
> > > >
> > > > There is the same last-in problem if the action is associated directly
> > > > with
> > > > the xpath-value rule
> > > > and there is some product specific information being placed in the
> > > > file.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I suppose I could add a cmd-line option and require the user to point
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > file containing the POST pipeline to run.
> > > > I really hate to require that of the user however.
> > > >
> > > > I'm open to suggestions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is a general idea of what the pipeline would look like.
> > > >
> > > > <windup:pipeline type="POST" id="My Switchyard Post Processor
> > > > Pipeline">
> > > >
> > > > <windup:post-process
> > > > class="org.jboss.post.process.switchyard.SwitchyardController">
> > > >
> > > > <windup:decorators>
> > > > <windup:action
> > > > class="org.jboss.post.process.switchyard.Service">
> > > > <property name="references">
> > > > <list>
> > > > <value>switchyard:Action:create service</value>
> > > > <value>switchyard:Action:set ref</value>
> > > > </list>
> > > > </property>
> > > > </windup:action>
> > > >
> > > > <windup:action
> > > > class="org.jboss.post.process.switchyard.Binding">
> > > > <property name="references">
> > > > <list>
> > > > <value>switchyard:Action:binding config
> > > > jms-bus</value>
> > > > <value>switchyard:Action:binding config
> > > > camel</value>
> > > > </list>
> > > > </property>
> > > > </windup:action>
> > > >
> > > > <!--
> > > > <windup:action
> > > > class="org.jboss.post.process.common.ConfigUpdate">
> > > > <property name="references">
> > > > <list>
> > > > <value>Adjust:some_common.xml file</value>
> > > > </list>
> > > > </property>
> > > > </windup:action>
> > > >
> > > > <windup:decorators>
> > > > </windup:post-process>
> > > >
> > > > </windup:pipeline>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
More information about the windup-dev
mailing list