[windup-dev] Iteration using Java's for?

[Ondrej Zizka]

On 25.7.2014 19:28, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
> Subquestions:
> Do we want to / can we restrict the Groovy DSL syntax anyhow?
> Will we aim for alternative XML-based rules which would translate to the
> API?
>
>
> On 25.7.2014 19:26, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a reason against querying the graph, storing it to Java
>> variable, iterating it using for( Foo foo : foos ), and skipping the
>> varstack and when() etc?
>> Basically, the current rules structure is appropriate for e.g. XML based
>> rules whose XSD would translate to this structure, but if we provide
>> Java and Groovy, the above way would be shorter to write, and users
>> might tend to do that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ondra
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev